Every check, and what has been read
Two ways in. By category, if you are deciding what kind of tool you need; by vendor, if someone has already given you a name.
By category
| Category | The question it turns on |
|---|---|
| Video generators | Is a clip length published anywhere outside the marketing copy? |
| Image to video | What does the licence permit you to upload, and who owns the result? |
| Image generators | Daily cap, credits and queue — are all three stated? |
| Companion chat | Is a retention period published for conversations? |
| Anime and cartoon | Does the content policy describe what the style filter refuses? |
| All generators | Which of the four product shapes is actually being sold? |
| The output itself | What does a generated clip look like, in plain description? |
By vendor
| Vendor | Sells | Name searches / mo | Documents read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perchance | Still images | 453,900 | 3 of 6 |
| OurDream AI | Several products | 231,000 | 4 of 6 |
| CrushOn AI | Companion chat | 200,200 | 3 of 6 |
| JuicyChat AI | Companion chat | 122,600 | 3 of 6 |
| Nastia AI | Companion chat | 28,000 | 3 of 6 |
| Kalon AI | Companion chat | 8,800 | 3 of 6 |
| Candy AI | Several products | 1,900 | 2 of 6 |
All seven at once
The seven are also tallied against each other — how many of the six documents each one answers, and what the count does not mean: seven vendors, six documents.
The state of the file
21 documents of 42
All 7 vendors were walked on 20 October 2026, and between them 21 of the 42 documents were opened. None reached all six. What stopped the walk is as often an interstitial or a sign-in page as a missing document, and that is recorded as what it is rather than counted as a refusal.
Published Furthest. OurDream AI, 4 of 6 — terms, privacy and the content policy set all readable.
Not published Shortest. Candy AI, 2 of 6, though both of those answer: it is one of two vendors here publishing retention periods.
Contradicted elsewhere Caught on the day. Kalon AI's own banner says every AI feature is switched off until further notice, which no document would have told us.
Paid placement
SpicyAI — Discover AI characters with unique personalities. Chat, share stories, or create a companion of your own — with text, voice, images, and video.
Contradicted elsewhere Pricing page. The only vendor read here that publishes its limits and its prices without a sign-in: $6.99 a week, $9.90 a month, $59.88 for twelve months, with 100 images and 10 videos a month on Premium. The same page then states the free allowance twice, as five chat turns on the plan card and ten turns per character in the table, and the Premium allowance twice, as unlimited on the card and 1,000 turns in total in the table.
Published Terms of service. Effective 2 December 2025, with the operator named and a contact address in the document. The user owns what they generate, and the licence running back is perpetual, irrevocable, sublicensable and transferable — and extends beyond operating the service to promotion and advertising.
Published Privacy policy. No retention period: the policy gives the factors it weighs instead, which is the same answer six of the eight catalogued vendors give. Chats and user content are used to train the models and are monitored for compliance, and the policy says so plainly rather than burying it.
Contradicted elsewhere Content policy. The community guidelines are the strongest of any vendor read here: eighteen and over, no character presented as younger than that and no aged-up rewrite of one, no sexualised depictions of real people without consent, human and automated review. The public tag list then carries jk, a Japanese abbreviation that denotes exactly the age bracket those guidelines rule out.
Published Checkout and cancellation. Card only, with other methods described as coming. Cancellation any time, with access running to the end of the billing cycle and no further charge — stated on the page where the subscription is sold rather than in a separate document.
Contradicted elsewhere Support channel. A support address is published, which several vendors here do not manage. Two of them, in fact: the terms give one address and the community guidelines give the same mailbox at a different domain.
About these checks
- Why do the vendor pages have gaps in them?
- Because an entry lists only what has been read, and the column above says how much that is. 21 of the 42 documents have been opened; the rest are recorded as unopened rather than guessed at. A page claiming to summarise a vendor's pricing without a dated quote from that vendor's pricing page is the thing this publication exists not to be.
- What gets a vendor a page at all?
- Search demand for its name. People arrive typing a product they were told about, and a page that meets them with an honest account of what is and is not documented is more use than silence. The demand figure is on each page for exactly that reason, and it is not a quality signal.
- Will you ever rank them?
- Only on documentation, and only when four fields are on file across at least five products: published limits, output rights, retention and the real price of the cheapest unrestricted tier. That table would sort on something stateable. A table sorted on impressions is not a ranking, it is a rate card.