Skip to the text
nsfw-ai-review 18+ · claim checks

Perchance: what has actually been read?

The largest name in this cluster by search demand — around 454 thousand a month across its spellings — and the only entry here whose privacy policy answers well and whose terms of service do not exist.

Still images3 of 6 documents readRevised 2026-10-19

How far the walk got

Three stops, and the shape of them is unusual: the privacy answer is the most favourable in the file and the terms do not exist at all. Both of those are properties of an open platform rather than of a product.

  1. Pricing page Not opened
  2. Terms of service Not published
  3. Privacy policy Published
  4. Content policy Contradicted elsewhere
  5. Checkout and cancellation Not opened
  6. Support channel Not opened

The walk for Perchance: 3 of the six documents opened, on 20 October 2026. Each stop restates the finding recorded further down this page, with the page it came from.

What is on file

FieldValue
CategoryStill images
Searched asperchance, perchance ai, perchance image
Documents readPrivacy policy, which also answers the content question; the terms route, which has nothing behind it
Outbound linkNone, by policy
Only one of the searched spellings names a product at all; the other two are the bare name, which is navigation rather than research.

A free product still has to answer three questions

Price is the only line a free tier removes from a comparison. The other three stay exactly as expensive to get wrong: how long prompts and generations are retained, what rights you hold in the output, and what the real daily ceiling is. None of the three is visible from a generate button, and a product with no payment relationship has less reason than most to publish them.

This vendor splits them. The retention question is answered, and answered better than anywhere else in the file. The output-rights question has no document to answer it: the conventional terms route returns a message explaining that the name is reserved, and the privacy policy links to no equivalent. Nothing here states who holds rights in what the generators produce, which is a different thing from stating that you do.

What the three unopened documents would settle

  1. Pricing page
    Are the limits stated in units a buyer can count?
    Satisfied by
    Clip length in seconds, resolution in pixels, generations per day as a number, queue priority described in words that mean something.
    Usually found
    A credit balance with no stated conversion, and the word unlimited somewhere above a fair-use clause that contradicts it.
    At stake
    This is the difference between a subscription that finishes work and one that runs out on a Tuesday.
  2. Checkout and cancellation
    What appears on the statement, and how does a subscription end?
    Satisfied by
    The billing descriptor published before payment, renewal terms stated in the flow, and cancellation available from inside the account.
    Usually found
    An undisclosed descriptor, a trial that upgrades to annual, and cancellation by email to an address answered in business days.
    At stake
    Subscription disputes are the most common complaint in adult services, and every one of them was decided at checkout.
  3. Support channel
    Can a question be asked before any money moves?
    Satisfied by
    A channel that answers a pre-sales question — anything from a ticket form to a staffed chat — with a human reply.
    Usually found
    A form that routes to nothing, or a help centre whose articles were written for a different product.
    At stake
    The channel that will not answer before payment is the channel that will not answer about a renewal.

What the documents said

3 of the six documents have been opened. Each row gives the page it came from and the date it was read; where a document carries its own last-modified date, that is in the note, because in this category the age of a policy is itself a finding.

PublishedPrivacy policy

The clearest retention statement of the four, and the only favourable one. The policy says in its own words that the AI text plugin used for chat and story generation does not store data on the server, that the text-to-image plugin does not either unless a user saves an image to a public gallery, and that logging in does not associate an account with generation requests. Advertising runs inside sandboxed iframes that cannot read what is typed into a generator. The formal retention section underneath is boilerplate with no period.

perchance.org/privacy-policy · read 2026-10-20

Not publishedTerms of service

No terms of service were found. The conventional path returns a message explaining that the name is reserved, and no equivalent document is linked from the privacy policy, so there is nothing stating who holds rights in generated output.

perchance.org/terms · read 2026-10-20

Contradicted elsewhereContent policy

The privacy policy warns that anyone can create a generator on the platform and that each page should be treated like a random page on the internet, with sensitive data never entered into one. That is a candid description of an open platform rather than a content policy, and it means the filter behaviour a buyer would want described is a property of each generator rather than of the site.

perchance.org/privacy-policy · read 2026-10-20

Paid placement

SpicyAI — Discover AI characters with unique personalities. Chat, share stories, or create a companion of your own — with text, voice, images, and video.

Contradicted elsewhere Pricing page. The only vendor read here that publishes its limits and its prices without a sign-in: $6.99 a week, $9.90 a month, $59.88 for twelve months, with 100 images and 10 videos a month on Premium. The same page then states the free allowance twice, as five chat turns on the plan card and ten turns per character in the table, and the Premium allowance twice, as unlimited on the card and 1,000 turns in total in the table.
Published Terms of service. Effective 2 December 2025, with the operator named and a contact address in the document. The user owns what they generate, and the licence running back is perpetual, irrevocable, sublicensable and transferable — and extends beyond operating the service to promotion and advertising.
Published Privacy policy. No retention period: the policy gives the factors it weighs instead, which is the same answer six of the eight catalogued vendors give. Chats and user content are used to train the models and are monitored for compliance, and the policy says so plainly rather than burying it.
Contradicted elsewhere Content policy. The community guidelines are the strongest of any vendor read here: eighteen and over, no character presented as younger than that and no aged-up rewrite of one, no sexualised depictions of real people without consent, human and automated review. The public tag list then carries jk, a Japanese abbreviation that denotes exactly the age bracket those guidelines rule out.
Published Checkout and cancellation. Card only, with other methods described as coming. Cancellation any time, with access running to the end of the billing cycle and no further charge — stated on the page where the subscription is sold rather than in a separate document.
Contradicted elsewhere Support channel. A support address is published, which several vendors here do not manage. Two of them, in fact: the terms give one address and the community guidelines give the same mailbox at a different domain.

Go to SpicyAI Go to the Telegram bot

Questions

Is Perchance AI safe?
On storage, its privacy policy makes the most favourable statement in this file: the text plugin used for chat and story generation does not keep data on the server, the text-to-image plugin does not either unless an image is saved to a public gallery, and logging in does not associate an account with generation requests. On output rights it says nothing, because there is no terms of service to say it in. Those are two different answers to one word.
Is this a full review?
Three of the six documents, which is as far as the walk got. The privacy policy and the content position were readable; the terms of service do not exist. Pricing, checkout and support have not been opened, and the entry says so rather than padding the gap with impressions of the interface.
What has this desk read about Perchance?
The privacy policy, read 20 October 2026, and the page where a terms of service would be, which returns a message saying the name is reserved. The privacy policy also carries the clearest description of what the platform is: anyone can publish a generator on it, and each one should be treated like any other page on the internet.
Does a free product need paperwork at all?
More than a paid one, arguably. Price is the single question a free tier answers; retention, output rights and daily limits are untouched by it, and those are the three that decide whether anything made there can be used or kept.
What would change this page?
The three documents still unopened, or a terms of service appearing where there is currently none. Both go on this page with their sources and the date they were read, in the same format as the three already below.